The Historic Basis for Jewish Imperialism

Dearborn Independent Reading for subscribers

The excellent article from the July 17, 1920 edition of the Dearborn Independent is relevant to our present moment in practically every way. It asserts that discussion of Jewish influence and power has become more open in the United States since the series began, suggesting that it was previously a taboo subject dominated by Jewish voices for favorable propaganda. Of course, this relative openness in discussing the JQ fell sharply out of favor following the post-WW2 atrocity propaganda, but today we are seeing flickers of a resurgence.

It also claims that a Jewish imperialistic program exists, not as a recent development, but as a long-standing plan rooted in centuries of thought and experience, distinct from any modern political parties, ideologies, or formulations… a point that I’ve been making for years. The Jews are simultaneously communist and capitalist… leftist and rightist… nationalist and internationalist… and at the same time they are none of those things. Modern political ideologies are only ‘incidental’ to the overall agenda… any and all sides of the political debate get co-opted when it is convenient for them.

The piece argues that evidence of this program is becoming undeniable, forcing both Jewish and non-Jewish perspectives to shift. It describes Jewish reactions as initially denying such a program, then justifying it as a response to oppression (something we see again and again today) while non-Jewish reactions reportedly dismiss it as limited to foreign Jews, though some acknowledge a broader subversive movement led by revolutionary Jews.

It then posits that this alleged Jewish imperialism is not a spontaneous creation but a deeply historical and organized effort, implying the existence of a central authority or leadership, and roots this assertion in the historical nature of Jewish governance within its own ‘nation’. It further characterizes Jewish tendencies as inherently supportive of autocracy and driven by a pursuit of power through wealth, particularly via money-making, as a means to secure position.

Overall, it is a fascinating piece, and I encourage you to share it… although, the link to the reading is here only available for paid subscribers.